Clinical study of [123I] N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-iodobenzamide in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic ocular melanoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of scintigraphy with [123I]N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-iodobenzamide (BZA), a phase II clinical trial was performed on 48 patients with a suspicion of ocular melanoma. METHODS: 56 examinations were performed to image lesions with a clinical diagnosis of primary ocular melanoma before and/or after treatment, to observe the results in simulating lesions or to image metastases. RESULTS: Ocular BZA-scintigraphy demonstrated a sensitivity of 86%, and a specificity of 83%. Whole-body scintigraphy was used in the follow-up of treated patients and could be repeated. We imaged orbital recurrence, known and occult metastases, specially in the liver. After 9 conservative treatments ocular BZA-scintigraphy was negative in 9 eyes. CONCLUSION: The BZA-scintigraphy in combination with other diagnostic procedures appeared to be a suitable method in the diagnosis of ocular melanoma and a potentially useful imaging modality to screen for ocular malignant melanoma metastases.

Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Intra-arterial injection of radioactive Lipiodol has shown promising results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal obstruction. The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with HCC. From September 1990 to September 1993, 142 patients (135 men, 7 women; age: 65 +/- 6.6 years) were randomly assigned to treatment groups and given either intra-arterial injections of 131I-labeled Lipiodol (60 mCi; 2.2 GBq) (n = 73) or chemoembolization (70 mg cisplatin) (n = 69). Subsequent injections were given at 2, 5, 8, 12, and 18 months. Tumor response was assessed on the basis of tumor size and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Patient tolerance was assessed clinically and angiographically. Survival rate was the main end-point. A total of 129 patients (65 in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group and 64 in the chemoembolization group) were available for analysis; 13 were excluded, mainly because of portal vein thrombosis. The two groups were comparable. Actuarial survival curves were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall survival rates at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 69%, 38%, 22%, 14%, and 10%, and 66%, 42%, 22%, 3%, and 0% in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Reduction in tumor size was similar for the two groups, with complete response in 1 and 0 patients and partial response in 15 and 16 patients in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Tolerance was significantly better in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group both clinically (3 severe side effects vs. 29 in the chemoembolization group; P < .001) and angiographically (1 arterial thrombosis vs. 10 in the chemoembolization group; P < .01). In terms of patient survival and tumor response, radioactive 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization were equally effective in the treatment of HCC, but tolerance to 131I-labeled Lipiodol was significantly better.

Myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m-Tc NOET: comparison with thallium-201 and coronary angiography.

UNLABELLED: We compared TcN-NOET [bis(N-ethoxy, N-ethyl dithiocarbamato)nitrido 99mTc] and 201Tl images to estimate the utility of this compound in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing cardiac catheterization had stress-redistribution-reinjection 201Tl SPECT imaging, stress-delayed (2, 4 and 6 hr postinjection) and rest-delayed (4 hr postinjection) TcN-NOET SPECT imaging. RESULTS: Nineteen patients had coronary stenosis > or = 50% and six were normal. Stress TcN-NOET and 201Tl imaging were concordant for the presence of CAD in 22/25 patients (88%, kappa = 0.76 +/- 0.20). The overall sensitivity of TcN-NOET SPECT imaging was 74% (14/19 patients) and 68% (13/19 patients) for 201Tl SPECT imaging. The specificity was 100% (6/6 patients) for both techniques. The overall agreement of TcN-NOET and 201Tl for the presence of disease in individual coronary arteries was 96% (72/75 arteries, kappa = 0.92 +/- 0.16). Segmental analysis of stress images showed a concordance in 211/225 segments (94%, kappa = 0.82 +/- 0.09). Comparison of the 4-hr images showed a concordance between 201Tl and TcN-NOET in 21/23 patients. Following TcN-NOET injection at rest, seven patients had a defect on the initial images, which had normalized 4 hr postinjection in four patients (57%). CONCLUSION: Perfusion imaging with TcN-NOET and 201Tl gives comparable diagnostic information in patients undergoing exercise testing for assessment of CAD. Because of the normalization of myocardial activity 4 hr after injection in some patients, we conclude that TcN-NOET is a potential technetium compound equivalent to 201Tl.

Randomized controlled trial for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: intra-arterial iodine-131-iodized oil versus medical support.

UNLABELLED: Portal vein thrombosis is a poor prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a contraindication for chemoembolization. Intra-arterial injection of 131I-iodized oil which does not modify arterial flow, is feasible in this condition. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the efficacy of treatment with radiolabeled oil (treated group) versus medical support (control group) in patients with stage I or II HCC (classification of Okuda) with portal vein thrombosis. METHODS: Twenty-seven HCC patients (26 males, 1 female), aged 53-79 yr, with portal vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to Lipiocis group (n = 14) or Control group (n = 13). Additional injections of radiolabeled oil were given 2, 5, 8 and 12 mo after initial therapy. Medical support treatment consisted of: tamoxifen (n = 5), 5 FU intravenously (n = 1), NSAIDs or corticosteroids (n = 5). Efficacy was evaluated according to survival rate (Kaplan-Meier method; log rank test), AFP serum values (measured at 2, 5, 8 and 12 mo) and angiography. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable (Child's classification, Okuda's classification, liver function tests, location of the thrombus). Tolerance was excellent in the Treated group. The actuarial survival curves were significantly different (p < 0.01) between the two groups, the survival rates (Cl 95%) at 3, 6 and 9 mo being 71% (48%-95%), 48% (12%-55%), 7% (1%-31%) for the Treated group; and 10% (1%-33%), 0% and 0% for the Control group. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial hepatic injection of 131I-labeled iodized oil is a safe and effective palliative treatment of HCC with portal vein thrombosis.